|
|
Post by gainsb1 on Feb 19, 2017 10:51:12 GMT 1
Just when I thought that no other car could match the awful-looking Nissan Juke (Sorry if you've got one....)Toyota go and release this monstrosity (Sorry if you've got one....). Thank heavens we were brought up with stylish cars that were produced in clay models to "Look Good" without crash impact requirements, low air drag co-efficients and electrics that defy the DIY-er. Am I wrong? Let me know...
PS What does C-HR stand for.... I've got some ideas.. 
Leigh (Area rep)
|
|
randywanger
Full Member
Posts: 265 
Location: Chamonix or Essex
|
Post by randywanger on Feb 19, 2017 15:29:04 GMT 1
Fiat Multipla?
|
|
|
|
Post by gainsb1 on Feb 19, 2017 21:39:36 GMT 1
Yeah, actually.... you have a point (sorry if you've got one....)
Leigh (Area rep) |
|
|
|
Post by spottedlaurel on Feb 19, 2017 21:42:42 GMT 1
The C-HR is certainly an odd beast. A bit like an off-road E10 120A.....
|
|
randywanger
Full Member
Posts: 265
Location: Chamonix or Essex
|
Post by randywanger on Feb 20, 2017 20:43:55 GMT 1
Yeah, actually.... you have a point (sorry if you've got one....)
Leigh (Area rep) Oh god no, but got to be one of the most ugliest modern cars. Or a Citroen C4 Cactus. |
|
|
|
Post by gainsb1 on Feb 20, 2017 22:30:48 GMT 1
Or a Citroen C4 Cactus...
Yes, what is it with those plastic "shoulder pads"? Yuk! (Sorry if you've got one....)
Leigh (Area rep)
|
|
randywanger
Full Member
Posts: 265
Location: Chamonix or Essex
|
Post by randywanger on Feb 21, 2017 20:11:10 GMT 1
There are some really ugly cars out there. Not sure what's worse, the designers, the people who approve the designs or the people who buy the cars?
|
|
|
|
Post by sunsetblvd on Mar 3, 2017 0:08:51 GMT 1
It's better looking than the Nissan Duke - not hard in fairness.
The C-HR doesn't look too bad from the front, no??
But it has ALL gone wrong round the back.
Bit like the Kardashians
|
|
